Monday, January 25, 2016


Vanderburgh County Court - Superior Misdemeanor Court
                                            825 Sycamore St.
                                            Vanderburgh County Clerk
                                            Room 200 P.O. Box 3356
                                            Evansville IN. 47732

9-21-5-6(a) / IFC: Speeding - Exceeding Locally Set Speed Limit a local authority has CHANGED
9-25-8-2(a)(1)/IFA: Operating a Motor Vehicle Without FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

State of Indiana

Jesha D. Miller     [ New Address ]     1733 Davcohn Ave.
                                                          Evansville IN. 47714


Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann is subpoena’ to appear in person at the Vanderburgh Superior Misdemeanor Court February 2, 2016 at 1:30 pm. Attend & Testify producing document sent by certified mail  # 7015 0640 0004 4019 0852 to shut down Court due to corruption in the entire Judicial Branch of government. [ See: ]  Proof the prosecutor is in full knowledge he is prosecuting citizen’s without an avenue to justice due to government refusing to address the Constitution’s checks & balances to clean up Judicial Branch corruption, uphold the integrity of the Constitution, & run a clean government. Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann was informed by facebook of the financial situation & asked to provide insurance & vehicle registration so I would be in compliance with the law. Also bring previous subpoena due to the same lack of money for insurance. The defendant violated no law because there is no law of effect until government address the checks & balances to restore the integrity by addressing the Checks & Balances which are intended to uphold the integrity of the Constitution. The defendant financial responsibility was not met due to government economic oppression as the treasury has refused to pay the defendant Jesha D. Miller 50 million dollars owed for default on the 14th Amendment right to due process. Government itself must be held to the rule of law which they have violated & concealed from the public. Violated are the 5th, 6th, 13th, & 14th Amendments guaranteed under the Bill of Rights, rights government must protect yet have refused corrupting the Judicial Branch of government.
[ ]  Fax # 812 435 5810
U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch is subpoena also to appear in person at the Vanderburgh Superior Misdemeanor Court this February 2, 2016 at 1:30 pm to attend & testify producing the petition using the Constitution’s checks & balances that the Justice system refused to process in a timely manner to evade the checks & balances & impose poverty on the defendant Jesha Miller refusing to pay the defendant Jesha Miller 50 million dollars owed for default of rights guaranteed.
[ SEE: ] Sent by priority mail EK  520965419 US  which arrived June 1, 2015. When the Justice Department run by Attorney General Loretta Lynch failed to process the petition in the timely manner between 60 to 90 days the Justice department refused to correct it. Page 2 requires government pay the 50 million owed which I could take care of the financial responsibility of operating a motor vehicle.
[ The defendant still cannot afford insurance & registration so inform all officers not to stop the defendant Jesha Miller for expired plates for they cannot enforce the law when the Justice Department & the Judicial Branch are corrupt & refuse to run a clean government by addressing the checks & balance & continue economic oppression by refusing to pay the 50 million dollars owed. [ SEE: ]. The Attorney General Loretta Lynch cannot disparage - meaning belittle because the GRAVITY OF THIS IS AS BIG AS IT GETS AS NEVER BEFORE HAS THERE BEEN EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. The checks & balances are historical the same as was WATERGATE where they were used to clean up government corruption by President Richard Nixon. The U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch must appear because she must be held accountable for her responsibility to enforce the law which the Justice Department has evaded in violation of the code of Ethics requiring every government official to uphold the Constitution & Laws of the U.S. & never to be a part of its evasion.
     This is could have been avoided by Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann dismissing the ticket which his Prosecutor Spady refused to do. The Judge Shoulders must also take notice of the petition to shut down the Court & inform the media that they as officials who get their authority from the Constitution must adhere to the Constitution’s checks & balances petitioned by Jesha D. Miller. Att. Gen. Loretta Lynch is therefore required to be at this hearing & trial which is not undue burden or expense. The integrity of the Constitution takes priority over all matters & she cannot continue to evade the fact of irrefutable evidence of corruption to deny money, dereliction of duty, & abuse of power by the U.S. Supreme Court & an act against the law imposing slavery by the U.S. Supreme Court so the appellate court system does not work when the highest Court refuses to adhere to the demands of the Constitution. The Justice Department refused to process with the ulterior motive to evade paying me the 50 million dollars which prevented my financial responsibility & this petition must be presented on February 2, 2016 as evidence the government corruption prevented me from complying with my financial responsibility.

                                                       Text of Rule 45 (d) & (e)
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees—on a party or attorney who fails to comply.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.  (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.                                                                          (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:  (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an order compelling production or inspection. (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district where compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that:        (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;(ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits specified in Rule 45(c); (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information; or (ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party. (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party: (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information: (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery. (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information under seal to the court for the district where compliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.
Respectfully Subpoena - JESHA D. MILLER                                                  DATE: JANUARY 25, 2016                                                                                  email                                                                                Judge Jeffrey Shoulders issue subpoena to U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Dear Jesha Miller,

Your fax to NICHOLAS HERMANN at 8124355810 has been sent successfully!
Successful delivery of your fax was confirmed at 9:16 AM Eastern Standard Time on January 25th, 2016.
Your fax included 1 page of coversheet with your text and 3 pages of attached documents.
Thank you,